As expected, differences in longterm outcomes of coronary artery. Syntax trial one year macce results serruys, et al. The new england journal of medicine 994 n engl j med 371. As in the previous reports, outcomes were similar with coronary artery bypass grafting and. Notable articles of 2015 the new england journal of. Cabg still winning, but pci acceptable in lowrisk patients larry husten, phd. Fiveyear results of the syntax trial nejm journal watch.
Complete revascularization with multivessel pci for myocardial. Revascularization for sihd patients stable ischemic heart. Revascularization strategies syntax, bari 2d, and stich. Coronary angiography after cardiac arrest without st. Ronen, md, class of 2021 ttuhsc of the permian basin click links in blue below to access. Randomized trials have suggested that drugeluting stents may. The excel trial evaluation of xience versus coronary artery bypass surgery for effectiveness of left main revascularization 2 compared everolimuseluting stent with cabg.
These results confirm and extend the earlier findings from this landmark trial. Why we still need randomized trials to compare effectiveness. Park the results of the maincompare registry syntaxes. The syntax trial reported similar survival in patients with denovo threevessel and left main coronary artery disease randomly assigned to pci with paclitaxeleluting stents versus cabg after 5 years of. In the international syntax trial, 1800 patients with threevessel or left main coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to either revascularization with coronaryartery bypass grafting cabg. The trial protocol available with the full text of this article at was designed by several of the authors and was approved by the principal investigator and the ethics committee at each.
For patients with less complex disease low syntax scores or left main coronary. When one considers that in the united states, the mean number of stents deployed per procedure is. Stenting clinical implications of the syntax trial nejm. National clusterrandomized trial of dutyhour flexibility. These two interventions were compared in the syntax trial, which was sponsored by the manufacturer of the taxus drugeluting stent. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronaryartery. In the syntax trial, among 417 patients with left main coronary artery disease and syntax scores of 32 or lower, the rate of the composite end point of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction at 5. Current participation in another clinical trial in which a patient is taking an investigational drug or receiving an investigational medical device. Coronary heart disease chd is a major cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world, and both surgical revascularisation coronary artery bypass grafting, cabg and. The syntax trial, published in 2009 in nejm, sought to determine the optimal mode of revascularization coronary artery bypass graft or cabg vs. Oneyear outcomes of the syntax trial supplementary appendix this appendix has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information. As in the previous reports, outcomes were similar with coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention in the lowest tertile of syntax score, whereas cabg outcomes were superior in the highest tertile.
In this multicenter trial, we randomly assigned 552 patients who had cardiac arrest without signs of stemi to. The synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery syntax compared pci with des and cabg in patients with untreated 3vd andor lms. Syntax iii revolution trial shows ctffr could replace. Revascularization excel trial,2 which involved patients. Coronary angiography after cardiac arrest without stsegment. This openlabel, nonrandomized study reports that pci using the syntaxii strategy was associated with superior clinical outcomes compared with the pci arm of the original. Syntax trial macce after 2 years30% of pci,23% of cabg a hr of 5 was defined accordingly as the clinically acceptable noninferiority limit not to be exceeded by the onesided 95% ci 1. Eighteen hundred patients with previously untreated left. In the syntax trial 1800 patients with previously untreated leftmain or threevessel disease were randomized to cabg or pci. Our trial compared pci and cabg for treating patients with previously untreated threevessel or left main. A very useful part of the syntax trial was not only reinforcing a multidisciplinary team approach but the introduction of the syntax score. The new england journal of medicine n engl j med 373. Syntax the synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery study 1year data.
Trial of everolimuseluting stents or bypass surgery for. Nejm 2009 % t n e v e r a l u c s a v o i d r a c n8 n30 n33 n266. The fairness of this randomization assignment has become a subject of. Results are in and they are mixed march 16, 2019 compared to drug therapies, catheter ablation, a common cardiovascular procedure, didnt achieve a significant reduction. The new england journal of medicine n engl j med 375. Randomly assigned 1800 patients with threevessel or left main. Background left main coronary artery disease is associated with high. Tct362 checking the reality of the syntax iii revolution. Threeyear outcomes from the syntax trial continue to show the overall superiority of cabg over pci.
Stenting clinical implications of the syntax trial. The syntax trial is designed to determine the best treatment for patients with complex coronary disease blocked or narrowed arteries in both the right and left sides of the heart by. In almost every clinical trial, a summary table with statistics comparisons is always reported before performing any statistical analysis among treatments. Revascularization strategies syntax, bari 2d, and stich angioplasty summit 2010 seoul, korea david r.
In the syntax trial, investigators compared percutaneous coronary intervention pci with coronary artery bypass grafting cabg in patients. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronaryartery bypass. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous. Volume 381, issue 9867, 23 february1 march 20, pages 629638. Trial of everolimuseluting stents or bypass surgery for coronary. Rh 68 yo nondiabetic male with exercise intolerance and a positive stress test. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with threevessel. Syntax, 2009 trial summary pdf trial summary a randomised clinical trial investigating the effect of paclitaxel eluting stent versus cabg in patients with previously untreated threevessel or left main. Thuijs presented the results of the syntaxes trial and s. The results of syntax iii revolution trial suggests that clinical decision making is feasible using coronary computed tomography angiography ccta in patients with multivessel disease. Cabg should remain the standard of care for patients with complex lesions high or intermediate syntax scores. Omt is associated with improved 5year survival after revascularization syntax. This article was published on october 31, 2016, at nejm. The complexity of disease in the trial is worthy of discussion.
Nejm landmark trial repository prepared 2122020 by. In recent years, studies of multivessel coronary angioplasty randomized patients between surgery and intervention. In the international syntax trial, 1800 patients with threevessel or left main coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to either. There are miscellaneous, lancet, acc, and jama links included where original nejm. Coronaryartery bypass surgery in patients with left.
1296 636 961 1466 130 1060 613 672 569 1120 935 692 491 1572 1516 1045 1082 1066 1117 1587 137 76 531 1123 514 42 897 1119 1204 340 456 1154 653